DOJ confirms in court papers the "anti-weaponization fund" isn't going forward
In a pair of legal filings Friday, the Justice Department stated in writing for what appears to be the first time that a controversial $1.7 billion "anti-weaponization fund" will not continue.
Related News
Judge refers DOJ lawyers for possible discipline over handling of transgender care probe
U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy had lambasted Justice Department lawyers in a decision last month and accused them of …
FBI fires analysts who worked on memo about Catholic extremist ideology
The five fired FBI analysits were involved in the creation of a withdrawn internal 2023 intelligence memo on "Radical T…
Eric Schmitt rips Hirono over denaturalization bill: 'You're damn right we're deporting' criminals
Sen. Schmitt criticized Sen. Hirono after she accused the Trump administration of terrorizing immigrant communities dur…
DOJ confirms in court papers the anti-weaponization fund is "not going forward"
In a pair of legal filings Friday, the Justice Department stated in writing for what appears to be the first time that …
DOJ asks court to reject lawsuit against "anti-weaponization fund"
The DOJ urged judges to reject efforts to block its $1.7 billion "anti-weaponization fund," arguing the cases are moot …
A U.S. judge struck down several of the Trump administration’s efforts to restrict asylum claims and other immigration benefits, finding the measures exceeded agency authority and were motivated by “anti-immigrant sentiments”
The Friday ruling voided four policies that put “the lives of countless individuals on hold,” U.S. District Judge John …
The Wall Street Journal
• 2 hours ago